READING…
tubule formation · g10.91
lymphocytic infiltrate0.86
fibrotic stroma0.85
high-grade DCIS0.88

Decode every cancer.

95% of Indian cancer patients are treated without molecular testing. The signature is already on the H&E slide their lab produced. Hue is being built to read it — trained on Indian cohorts, starting in breast, lung, cervix, and colorectal.

One reading.
Three places it goes.

The same reading — biomarker calls, regions of attention, confidence — surfaces where the work already happens. Pharma medical affairs identifying patients. R&D cohort scientists asking outcome-linked questions of Indian tissue. Pathology labs returning a co-signed companion-diagnostic report into the LIS.

§ 01
Hue Access
Find the patients an access program is supposed to reach.

Pharma medical-affairs programs run on patient yield. Hue surfaces biomarker-stratified patients from the H&E slide their lab already produced — at the granularity of a single case, inside the lab where the patient presented.

  • Patient identification for pharma access programs
  • Biomarker-stratified cohort retrieval
  • Returns inside the existing LIS · no new workflow
In build · First commercial pilot · Q3 target
§ 02
Hue R&D Platform
Indian tissue, outcome-linked, query-able.

Indian cohorts are under-represented in every major cancer atlas. Hue is being built as a paired H&E + outcome-linked substrate of Indian cases — query-able by pharma R&D for cohort identification, real-world evidence, and discovery.

  • Paired H&E + outcome-linked Indian cases
  • Query-indexed cohort substrate
  • Match-rate-based recruitment
In design · Architecture · IRB pathway in motion
§ 03
Hue CDx
A companion-diagnostic report from the slide already produced.

Biomarker calls — HER2, MSI, EGFR — validated against orthogonal molecular testing on Indian cohorts, returned as a co-signed report inside the existing LIS. Designed for CDSCO Class C IVD and ISO 13485 audit readiness.

  • CDSCO Class C IVD · pathway open
  • ISO 13485 · roadmap in preparation
  • Validation paper · in preparation
In research · Regulatory pathway · 2027 horizon

The signature is already on the slide.
We just could not read it at scale.

For 150 years pathologists have read the headlines of an H&E slide — tissue architecture, grade, the obvious lesions. The molecular signature that determines what to do next has been in the same tissue, unread, because no one could see it at scale, in seconds, for the cost of a coffee. Hue is being built to read it — trained on Indian cohorts, validated against orthogonal molecular testing, co-signed by the pathologist.

01 · INGEST
From the slide the lab already produced.

Standard H&E, standard scanner, standard workflow. No new tissue, no new sample, no new procurement line. The reading meets the slide where it already exists.

02 · READ
Trained on a hundred thousand cases.

A working pathologist sees one slide at a time. The reading is trained across millions of cells and the outcomes that followed them — to recognise the patterns no single eye can see at this scale, and to return a structured call with its confidence.

03 · CO-SIGN
Surfaces what needs confirmatory testing — and what does not.

The treating pathologist co-signs every reading. Output flows back into the existing LIS as a structured report — biomarker calls, confidence, and the cases that warrant a confirmatory panel before treatment.

1.46 million cancers a year.
Read in the dark.

India produces twelve lakh H&E slides each year. The molecular calls that should follow them often do not — not because the tissue is missing, but because the workflow is. Hue is being built for that gap. Indian cohorts first; the figures below say why.

Treated without molecular testing
95%

Indian cancer patients whose treatment is set without ever knowing the molecular signature of their disease.

ICMR · published literature · clinical interviews
H&E slides produced annually
12lakh

Histopathology specimens read across Indian labs each year. The signal exists; the reading does not follow.

Estimated · ICMR + lab survey
Median time to a molecular call
3–7days

For HER2 / MSI / EGFR send-out testing from Indian centers — when it happens at all.

Mixed literature · clinical interviews

Eight indications.
One reading system.

The reading scope follows India's cancer burden, not Western incidence patterns. Four indications are the initial scope; four more are on the roadmap.

Initial scope
Breast
14.3% of Indian cancers
Highest-volume in Indian women. HER2 reading.
Initial scope
Lung
5.8% of Indian cancers
Leading cause of cancer death. EGFR reading.
Initial scope
Cervix
5.4% of Indian cancers
Persistently high in Indian women. P16 / HPV correlates.
Initial scope
Colorectal
4.7% of Indian cancers
Rising. MSI / MMR reading.
Roadmap
Mouth
5.2% of Indian cancers
India-distinctive burden. Roadmap indication.
Roadmap
Ovary
3.5% of Indian cancers
Gynae-oncology pathway. Roadmap.
Roadmap
Liver
2.5% of Indian cancers
HCC. Roadmap indication.
Roadmap
Prostate
2.4% of Indian cancers
Grading + biomarker. Roadmap.
Hue Atlas · An editorial preview

A serious record of what Indian pathology is doing, slide by slide. In preparation.

Report · Preview · 2026
The State of Cancer in India

A working manuscript on what India's slides know — and what gets translated, slowly, into a clinical decision. Preview chapters first.

Reading Room · § 01
On hematoxylin, briefly

A slide is, before anything else, a flat translation of three dimensions into one. The stains make that translation legible.

Atlas · Vol. I, Preview
Mitoses, atypia, and the limits of a model

Where an inference engine should be least sure, and why an equivocal flag is itself a useful clinical signal.

Join the early-access list.
We'll write back personally.

For pharma medical affairs, R&D, and academic pathology — leave an email and a short note. Hue is pre-launch; we read every message before approving any pilot.

WE WILL NEVER ADD YOU TO A MAILING LIST · WORK EMAIL PREFERRED
PHARMA
Cohort identification, access programs, R&D collaboration.
LABS · PATHOLOGISTS
Reading-system pilots inside existing LIS workflows.
ACADEMIC · ADVISORY
Validation co-authorship, clinical advisory board.